FACT CHECK:
Plenty to question in GOP debate
Republican presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt
Romney, left, and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, right,
during the Republican debate, Saturday, Dec. 10, 2011, in Des Moines,
Iowa. Attacked as a lifelong Washington insider, Gingrich parried
criticism from Mitt Romney Saturday night, telling the former
Massachusetts governor, "The only reason you didn't become a career
politician is because you lost to Teddy Kennedy in 1994."
(AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
WASHINGTON—When Michele Bachmann accused Newt Gingrich in the latest Republican debate of once supporting a cap-and-trade program to curb global warming, he huffily denied it and told her she should get her facts straight.
THE FACTS: Bachmann's suggestion that Gingrich and Romney are in lockstep was oversimplified. But she was right that Gingrich once backed the idea of capping carbon emissions and letting polluters trade emission allowances.
WASHINGTON—When Michele Bachmann accused Newt Gingrich in the latest Republican debate of once supporting a cap-and-trade program to curb global warming, he huffily denied it and told her she should get her facts straight.
Actually, she did.
As recently as 2007, Gingrich "strongly supported" the idea.
Viewers did not always get the straight goods Saturday night from other presidential hopefuls, either.
Mitt
Romney erred in saying Barack Obama was the only president to cut
Medicare. If Rick Perry had been a betting man, he probably would have
lost the $10,000 wager Romney wanted to make with him to settle
competing assertions.
A look at how some of the claims from the Saturday night debate and Sunday talk show aftermath compare with the facts:
BACHMANN: "If you look at Newt-Romney, they were for cap-and-trade."
GINGRICH:
"Well, Michele, a lot of what you say just isn't true, period. I have
never -- I oppose cap-and-trade. I testified against it the same day
that Al Gore testified for it. I helped defeat it in the Senate through
American Solutions. It is simply untrue. ... You know, I think it's
important for you, and this is a fair game and everybody gets to pick
fights. It's important that you be accurate when you say these things.
Those are not true."
THE FACTS: Bachmann's suggestion that Gingrich and Romney are in lockstep was oversimplified. But she was right that Gingrich once backed the idea of capping carbon emissions and letting polluters trade emission allowances.
Asked in a 2007 PBS "Frontline"
interview about President George W. Bush's endorsement of mandatory
carbon caps in his 2000 campaign, Gingrich said: "I think if you have
mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did
with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in
the solutions, that there's a package there that's very, very good. And
frankly, it's something I would strongly support."
To
be sure, Gingrich opposed a Democratic version of cap-and-trade when it
was adopted by the House. It died in the Senate. Many Republicans
considered it a market-distorting cap-and-tax plan instead.
Although
most candidates disavow the idea now, cap-and-trade once enjoyed
substantial Republican support because it sought to use market
mechanisms, not the heavy hand of government, to control pollution.
Congress in 1990 passed a law with overwhelming bipartisan support that
set up a trading system for sulfur dioxide, the main culprit behind acid
rain.
------
ROMNEY:
"Let's not forget, only one president has ever cut Medicare for seniors
in this country and it's Barack Obama. We're going to remind him of
that time and time again."
THE FACTS: Obama is at least the third president to sign cuts in Medicare that were passed by Congress.
The 1990
budget law signed by Republican President George H.W. Bush raised
premiums paid by Medicare beneficiaries and cut payments to hospitals,
doctors and other providers.
The
1997 balanced budget law signed by Democratic President Bill Clinton
scaled back Medicare payments to hospitals, home health agencies,
nursing homes and other providers, as well as raising monthly premiums
paid by older people. It reduced projected payment rates for doctors,
putting in place automatic cuts that Congress routinely has waived ever
since.
The law signed by
Obama strengthens traditional Medicare by improving preventive care and
increasing payments to primary care doctors and nurses serving as
medical coordinators, but reduces subsidies to private insurance plans
that have become a popular alternative to Medicare.
Obama
is cutting about 6 percent of spending from Medicare over 10 years.
Clinton and a Republican Congress came up with cuts of 12 percent.
------
PERRY:
"I'm listening to you, Mitt, and I'm hearing you say all the right
things. But I read your first book, and it said in there that your
mandate in Massachusetts -- which should be the model for the country --
and I know it came out of the reprint of the book, but, you know, I'm
just saying, you were for individual mandates, my friend."
ROMNEY: "You know what, you've raised that before, Rick. And you're simply wrong. ... $10,000 bet?"
PERRY: "I'm not in the betting business but ... I'll show you the book."
ROMNEY: "I've got the book and I wrote the book."
THE FACTS: At issue is a modification Romney made to his 2010 book, "No Apology," when it came out in paperback this year. Perry has several times accused the former Massachusetts governor of cutting a passage that proposed making the health insurance mandate in his state national, as Obama has done with his health care law.
The
Texas governor did so again on "Fox News Sunday" when he contended
Romney's hardcover edition "clearly stated that individual mandates
should be the model for this country and then he took that out of the
book in the paperback."
There
is little question Romney altered the words to dissociate himself more
clearly from Obama's plan. But the book and its excised passage did not
call for Romney's plan to go national. At most, it held out the
Massachusetts plan as a possible model for some states, not the federal
government, while emphasizing that states should find their own
solutions.
The book pitched
what Romney called his state's achievement, affordable insurance that
covers everyone, and said, "We can accomplish the same thing for
everyone in the country, and it can be done without letting government
take over health care." That came out.
------
RON PAUL: "We have dumped the debt on the American people through TARP funding as well as the Federal Reserve. So the debt is dumped onto people. And what did we do? We bailed out the people that were benefiting during the formation of the bubble. So as long as we do that, we're not going to have economic growth."
THE FACTS: The $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program was proposed by President George W. Bush and passed by Congress in 2008 to help rescue banks and other imperiled financial institutions. Nearly all of the money has been paid back, with interest.
------
RON PAUL: "We have dumped the debt on the American people through TARP funding as well as the Federal Reserve. So the debt is dumped onto people. And what did we do? We bailed out the people that were benefiting during the formation of the bubble. So as long as we do that, we're not going to have economic growth."
THE FACTS: The $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program was proposed by President George W. Bush and passed by Congress in 2008 to help rescue banks and other imperiled financial institutions. Nearly all of the money has been paid back, with interest.
Most
economists credit the program with keeping the financial system from
freezing up and helping to prevent the worst recession in 30 years from
becoming another Great Depression. The Federal Reserve does not operate
on taxpayer money and does not receive any operating funds from the
Treasury. In fact, it makes money every year from its banking
operations, and turns over profits to the Treasury.
1 comment:
Good article. The way our system of election is set up, the candidates get only flashes of time in front of the electorate. As a result they try for sound bites and tend to speak in hyperbole. Remove that limitation and we would likely find each to be rather more accurate. Your article is helpful. Regarding the Fed, the actions taken did temporarily prevent a total train wreck. However I personally believe that there are good arguments that the Fed, and the system of money creation that was created in 1913, is at the heart of many of our problems. Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye out :-) Ken Risley
Post a Comment